No. 21 Aggies edge No. 25 Huskers

NCAA Basketball Betting Lines

01/25/2007 - College Station, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - A'Quonesia Franklin scored 21 points, and the 21st-ranked Texas A&M Aggies outlasted No. 25 Nebraska, 66-65, in a Big 12 tilt.

Morenike Atunrase scored 19 points for the Aggies (14-4, 4-2 Big 12), who have won four of five. Danielle Gant scored 11 points for Texas A&M, which has a showdown at No. 6 Oklahoma on Saturday. La Toya Micheaux grabbed 11 rebounds for the Aggies.

Kiera Hardy scored 16 points for Nebraska (16-4, 4-2), but her last-second layup attempt that would have given the Cornhuskers the win bounced out. Kelsey Griffin scored 16 points and grabbed 10 boards for Nebraska, and Chelsea Aubry added 12 points in the loss.

Wwwc2i NCAA Basketball Betting News

<< No. 13 Baylor edges No. 24 Texas
Austin, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Bernice Mosby scored 23 points and grabbed 12 rebounds as 13th-ranked Baylor edged 24th-ranked Texas, 63-59, at the Erwin Center. Latara Darrett contributed 16 points for Baylor (17-3, 4-2 Big 12), which s

<< No. 8 Kansas crushes Baylor
Waco, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Brandon Rush scored 18 points and grabbed eight rebounds as the eighth-ranked Kansas Jayhawks ripped Baylor for an 82-56 victory. Julian Wright scored 16 points and grabbed six boards for the Jayhawks (1

<< Greene, Huskies top DePaul
Hartford, CT (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Kalana Greene netted a career-best 25 points and also collected 12 rebounds, as seventh-ranked UConn remained unbeaten in Big East play with an 88-76 victory over DePaul at Harry A. Gampel Pavilion. Charde

<< Ellington leads Tar Heels over Wake Forest
Winston-Salem, NC (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Wayne Ellington paced five North Carolina players in double figures with 18 points, as the fourth-ranked Tar Heels added to Wake Forest's conference struggles after an 88-60 victory over the Demon Deacons

<< Marquette runs past Seton Hall
Milwaukee, WI (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Wesley Matthews and Jerel McNeal each scored 22 points, as 15th-ranked Marquette defeated Seton Hall, 89-76, at the Bradley Center. McNeal also pulled down seven rebounds and dished out 10 assists as the Gol

West outscores East in All-Star Game >>
Dallas, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Columbus forward Rick Nash, Minnesota's Brian Rolston, Yanic Perreault of the Phoenix Coyotes and Martin Havlat of Chicago, all scored two goals, as the NHL All-Star Game returned from a three-year hiatus with a 12

Red Raiders score upset over sixth-ranked Aggies >>
Lubbock, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Martin Zeno scored 22 points and hit three free throws over the final 24.9 seconds, as Texas Tech upset No. 6 Texas A&M, 70-68, giving the Red Raiders their second victory over a top 10 team in less than a

No. 1 Florida survives scare from Miss. St. >>
Starkville, MS (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Corey Brewer had 20 points to lead top- ranked Florida over Mississippi State 70-67 at Humphrey Coliseum. Taurean Green added 11 points and Joakim Noah added 10 points and six rebounds for the Gators (1

Rockets hold off Spurs >>
San Antonio, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Tracy McGrady finished with 37 points, including a key three-point play down the stretch, as the Houston Rockets edged the San Antonio Spurs, 90-85, at the AT&T Center. McGrady also gathered eig

No. 17 Arizona gets back on track over ASU >>
Tucson, AZ (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Chase Budinger scored a game-high 21 points and pulled down 10 rebounds, as 17th-ranked Arizona trounced Arizona State, 71-47, at McKale Center. Budinger was a perfect 7-of-7 from the charity stripe and ad

How did changes to college football betting rules affect bettors?

The 2007 college football rules changes that were implemented to shorten games are now history. The NCAA rules committee did what they set out to do; games were cut by an average of 14 minutes per game last season. There were also, on average, 14 fewer plays per game. We’ll get into how that did (or didn’t) affect games in regards to the pointspread a bit later.

While the NCAA rules committee may have had the betterment of the game in mind, they'll now “turn back the clock” for next season. Two key rules have now been overturned by the NCAA committee for the 2007 season, something definitely for the better.

For those of you who may not remember what those rules actually were, let us refresh your memory.

1) The first one was actually starting the clock on a kickoff as soon as the kicker touched the ball rather than waiting until the returner touched it. The problem here was near the end of the half (or game), if the team leading was kicking off, they could milk the clock by intentionally running offsides and then re-kicking. They could run 10-15 seconds off the clock each play while taking just five-yard penalties each time. They could run the clock down and simply cause the half (or game) to end on a kickoff, keeping the opposing offense off the field. In 2007, the clock will now start when the returner touches the ball as it had before last season.

2) The second rule dealt with starting the clock after a change of online football betting possession rather than waiting until the ball was snapped. This took a lot of time off the clock throughout the game as teams changed possession, however it caused the most problems late in games (or halves). Rather than huddling up and calling a play, the offensive team would have to rush onto the field as the clock started. This was a definite disadvantage to a team that was trying to come from behind late in the game. This year the clock will start on a change of possession, after the ball is snapped.

How did those rules affect the college game last year and will it make a difference this year when it comes to the pointspread? We commonly heard two theories when it came to these changes. First, it would affect scoring negatively. Second, it would hurt favorites as they would have less time and fewer plays to cover the number.

Did the rules hurt scoring? Yes. It seemed obvious that shortening the game by what amounted to 14 plays would push scoring downward. That was the case last year. Of the 119 Division 1A teams, 69 squads scored fewer points in 2007 than they did in 2005. Just 48 teams had a higher PPG scoring average and two stayed the same. Almost 59 percent of the teams in college football last year had a lower PPG average than they did in 2005. Expect more scoring in 2007 as we revert back to the old rules.

Did the rules hinder favorites from covering the number in 2007? Not really. Last year the favorites posted an overall spread record of 336-350-16 (48.9 percent). The year before, favorites were 316-326-13 (49.2 percent). In 2004, the favorites were 316-339-2 (48.2 percent). In fact, college football favorites have been above 50 percent for the season just once in the last seven years (in 2003). Last year’s numbers fell right in line with where they have been historically.

How about big favorites? The rules must have hurt them? Maybe a little bit. Double-digit favorites last year came in at a 47.8 percent clip compare with an average of just over 50 percent over the last seven years. Since 1980, favorites of -10 or more have covered at exactly a 50 percent clip (measured over 6,716 games).

Even bigger favorites must have struggled? Not really. In fact, it was just the opposite. Favorites of three TD’s or more were 59-54-2 last year (52.2 percent). Since 2000, those same favorites (-21 or higher) hit at 51.3 percent and since 1990 came in a clip of 50.3 percent. Stepping it up a notch to four TD favorites or higher, we actually see they've covered at a much better rate last season than before. Last year, favorites of -28 or more were 31-21-1, or almost 60 percent. Historically, four-TD-or-higher favorites have come in at a 50.7 percent spot since 2000 and only 48.9 percent since 1990. The “perceived” problem with the favorites covering at a reduced rate really never came to fruition.

Bottom line is, there might be some more scoring in 2007, but no real revelations when it comes to finding any pointspread golden nuggets.

To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your bet on college football needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.